CIOReview CIOReview
Women In Tech Review
  • Home
  • Technology
    • Agile
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Audiovisual
    • Augmented & Virtual Reality
    • Big Data
    • BlockChain
    • Business Intelligence
    • BYOD
    • Cloud
    • Cloud Migration
    • Cognitive
    • Content Delivery Network
    • Data Analytics
    • Data Integration
    • Data Visualization
    • DevOps
    • Digital Accessibility
    • Digital Transformation
    • Digital Twin
    • Drone
    • Enterprise Architecture
    • FinTech
    • Gaming Tech
    • High Performance Computing
    • Infrastructure Security
    • Internet Of Things
    • Machine Vision
    • Mainframe
    • Mobile Application
    • Networking
    • Predictive Analytics
    • Quantum Computing
    • Remote Work Tech
    • Robotics
    • RPA
    • SDN
    • Security
    • Simulation
    • Smart City
    • SOAR
    • Software Testing
    • Storage
    • Video Surveillance
    • Virtualization
    • Web Development
    • Wireless
    • Women in Tech
  • Industry
    • Ad Agencies
    • Aerospace
    • Africa
    • Agtech
    • Automotive
    • Aviation
    • Banking & Insurance
    • Biotech
    • Canada
    • Capital Markets
    • Casino
    • Chemical & Allied
    • Construction
    • Consumer Packaged Goods
    • Contact Center
    • Defense
    • E-Commerce
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Food and Beverages
    • Healthcare
    • Latin America
    • Law Enforcement
    • Legal
    • Logistics
    • Manufacturing
    • Marine
    • Media & Entertainment
    • Metals & Mining
    • Naval Tech
    • Non Profit Technology
    • Oil & Gas
    • Pharma & life sciences
    • Proptech
    • Public Sector
    • Retail
    • Sports
    • Startups
    • Telecom
    • Textile & Apparel
    • Travel & hospitality
    • UAE
    • Utilities
  • Platforms
    • Adobe
    • Amazon
    • Cisco
    • Dassault Systemes
    • Dell
    • Google
    • HPE
    • HubSpot
    • IBM
    • Infor
    • Magento
    • Microsoft
    • NCR
    • NetApp
    • NetSuite
    • Oracle
    • Red Hat
    • Sage
    • Salesforce
    • SAP
    • SAS
    • VMware
  • Functions
    • Compliance
    • Contract Management
    • Corporate Finance
    • Environmental Health And Safety
    • GDPR
    • Human Resource
    • Marketing
    • Procurement
    • Sales Tech
    • Supply Chain
  • Conferences
  • About Us
Go to...

    I agree We use cookies on this website to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. More info

    • Home
    • Women in Tech

    Is Your Team Agile? Take This Test to Find Out

    By Gilli Aliotti, Agile Coach, Theagilewarrior.com

    Join With Our Contributor Network

    On progress..
    Success! Thanks For Joining With Our Contributor Network.
    You Have Already Joined With Our Contributor Network
    Sorry! Something went wrong. Please try again.
    Is

    Gilli Aliotti, Agile Coach, Theagilewarrior.com

    Agility in tech organizations is often tossed around as if it’s a buzz word, but very few are actually agile.

    “Oh, we are agile”, “We’re an agile shop”, “Yes, we run sprints”. But when you take a look under the hood, there are several KPIs to determine if truly an agile operation.

      Allowing the team to try new things, to come up with new solutions to problem statements, fosters a healthy and high-performing team 

    Let’s measure your team’s agility with some of these digestible, real-life examples following the

    12 principles of agile.

    1. Are you delivering working software that is valuable to the customer at the end of the sprint, or even better, several times within the sprint? Good job. Continuous delivery is key and delivering working software in weeks versus months.

    If you are spending weeks or even months in different development phases, from analysis (requirements phase), to design, to development, to testing, and then if all is approved, released to the customer after a long period of time, you are not agile. Requirements change over large periods of time, and by the time you gain stakeholder acceptance, they’ve changed their minds all together, let alone our customers may no longer need that feature or functionality. That is why a true agile team have smaller, iterative releases, where you can gain feedback quickly (preferably after a 2 week sprint, or even CI continuous deployment scenarios). This way the team can learn and adjust quickly, and experiment again, without too much time in between. Rapid deployments also foster the ability to get features to market quicker.

    2. Are you delivering extremely large and complex requirements to the team?

    If your product owner has handed over a manifesto of 20 pages for the next feature to develop, stop right there. These waterfall type requirements are a thing of the past, and don’t allow the team to experiment on several approaches to come up with the solution, and don’t capture changing requirements as we sprint. Simplicity is essential. Also, large requirements fosters bad habits of long-winded months on end waterfall type projects. Welcome changing requirements is key, through smaller iterations. Also clear requirements, both good design, and effective user stories enhances agility.

    3. Do you not know what’s going on, and one team is siloed off from another team? How independent and self-organized is your team really?

    Working together daily, together, is extremely important. Do you daily standups and share what you worked on yesterday, what are you working on today, and what are your blockers. Be self-organized in that each of the team members work as a whole to decide the implementation, and be like glue working together to solve and test the problem.

    4. Is your team self-organizing and true to their velocity? Are your team’s sprint tasks completing within a 2 week (or iterative) period? Good Job. A self-organized team with the ethos of simplicity is essential.

    If your tasks are carrying over to the next sprint regularly because they are just not completing then you’re not in touch with the velocity of your team, and perhaps the team are not as self-organized as they could be. Planning according to the velocity of the team is the key to a self-organized agile team. If product owners are pushing more work into the sprint than what is digestible, you are not allowing for a self-organized team, but instead taking a command and control waterfall approach. Allow the team members to estimate the planned tasks with story points to understand their capacity and break down those stories into

    bite-sized chunks to keep the sprint actionable. Simplicity is essential both in priority, prioritization and process.

    5. Are you often bringing in unplanned work mid-way into a sprint because the product owner or stakeholders say so? Consider that the best agile teams work with boundaries. Whether you work in sprint cycles (plan and protect for 1 or 2 weeks), or Kanban (regular planning that only allows up to 8 tickets in progress at 1 time), you are always helping the team with limits, so that they can stay self-organized and working to the velocity of their team by promoting sustainable development. Build projects around motivated individuals and let them fly.

    6. Are you just going from one sprint to another without reflecting on lessons learned, or areas to improve? One of the key agile principles is to reflect how to become more effective. We want the team to continuously improve, and the only way to do that is to reflect on what worked well, and what didn’t. As a self-organized team, they can measure their own success, be accountable for failing, be OK to fail, and continuously improve.

    Sprints are, indeed, an experiment. Allowing the team to try new things, to come up with new solutions to problem statements, fosters a healthy and high-performing team.

    Women in Tech Special

    • Women In Tech Special

      2021-06-25

      #

    Editor's Pick

    • Why Cloud Services Should Drive your Enterprise Security Architecture
      Why Cloud Services Should Drive your Enterprise Security Architecture

      By Shew McGrew, Director of Infrastructure and Operations and Lester Godsey, Chief Information Security and Privacy Officer, Maricopa County

    • Biggest Risk - People or Technology?
      Biggest Risk - People or Technology?

      By Deana Elizondo, Director, Cyber Risk & Security Services, American Electric Power

    • Robust and Reliable Data Systems for Risk Reporting and Escalation
      Robust and Reliable Data Systems for Risk Reporting and Escalation

      By Shannon M Kelly, SVP, Head of Model Risk Management, Zions Bancorporation

    • Risk – It
      Risk – It's Lurking around the Covid Corner

      By Amanda Aponte, FCAS, MAAA, Vice President & Chief Risk Officer, SFM Mutual Insurance Company

    • Continuing to Increase Velocity with Re-Usable Components
      Continuing to Increase Velocity with Re-Usable Components

      By Linda Tai, Chief Technology Officer, Fannie Mae

    • The Golden Age of BI Faded into the Background
      The Golden Age of BI Faded into the Background

      By Patrycja Kujawa, Vice President, Information Management, Auto Canada

    • The Great Space Race (For Data Centers)
      The Great Space Race (For Data Centers)

      By Ali Greenwood, Executive Director, Data Center Advisory, Cushman & Wakefield

    • How to Successfully Navigate a Digital Marketing Transformation
      How to Successfully Navigate a Digital Marketing Transformation

      By Melissa Power, Director of Digital Marketing and Branding, SouthState Bank

    • Cyber Grc: Core Enabler Of Strategic Cybersecurity
      Cyber Grc: Core Enabler Of Strategic Cybersecurity

      By Jamie Sanderson, Director of Cyber Governance, Risk, and Compliance,AES

    • Technology enabling smarter location decisions
      Technology enabling smarter location decisions

      By Barrie Scardina, Head of Retail & Jim Kierski, Retail Consulting Lead, Americas, Cushman and Wakefield

    Copyright © 2022 CIOReview. All rights reserved. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy       |       Disclaimer